updated 30 June 2018
<PREVIOUS PAGE ~ index ~ NEXT PAGE> |
Highly recommended for the curious is Jane E. Boyd's excellent article, "Celluloid, the Eternal Substitute" in Chemical Heritage Magazine. Not only does Boyd discuss the characteristics of the process, the author also examines the social implications of its use.
|
"NO MORE WASHEE WASHEE, MELICAN MAN WEAR CELLULOID COLLAR AND CUFF" (published by Doerner & Gunther. Lith. 62 Duane St. N.Y., 1870) |
Here's a quote from Google Books:
From About.com, "A Visual History of Chinese Laundries in Social Culture" by laundry expert Mary Marlowe Leverette, illustrates just how widely the anti-Chinese sentiment of this period of American history has been recognized by 21st century Americans. Here's what Leverette has to say about the above card:
While this card advertises the patented waterproof celluloid collars and cuffs available in gents' furnishing and fancy good houses across the country; it also reflects the discriminatory movement to send Chinese immigrants back to China that was prevalent in the 1880s in America. The term "Melican Man" is a racial joke of how the immigrants pronounced "American Man".In 1882 the US Congress passed and President Arthur signed into law the shameful "Chinese Exclusion Act" which was designed to exclude ethnic Chinese from entering the country.
Discrimination against those of actual or perceived Chinese ancestry continues into the 21st century, as demonstrated by this YouTube interview:
publisher: Forbes Co., Boston |
Ad from the Carroll Herald, 15 Sept. 1880:
Other advertising utilized the power of the written word. According to this excerpt from Google Books,
You'll "have my ear" --if you comment below-- |
This site includes historical materials that may contain negative stereotypes or language reflecting the culture or language of a particular period or place. These items are presented as part of the historical record, and do not represent or in any way reflect the personal views of the author of this blog, his ancestors, or his family.
Comments